Thursday, May 16, 2013

Portuguese Literature


“The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis”
by Jose Saramago


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Jose Saramago,  (born November 16, 1922, Azinhaga, Portugal—died June 18, 2010, Lanzarote, Canary Islands, Spain), Portuguese novelist and man of letters who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1998.
The son of rural labourers, Saramago grew up in great poverty in Lisbon. After holding a series of jobs as mechanic and metalworker, Saramago began working in a Lisbon publishing firm and eventually became a journalist and translator. He joined the Portuguese Communist Party in 1969, published several volumes of poems, and served as editor of a Lisbon newspaper in 1974–75 during the cultural thaw that followed the overthrow of the dictatorship of António Salazar. An anticommunist backlash followed in which Saramago lost his position, and in his 50s he began writing the novels that would eventually establish his international reputation.
One of Saramago’s most important novels is Memorial do convento (1982; “Memoirs of the Convent”; Eng. trans. Baltasar and Blimunda). With 18th-century Portugal (during the Inquisition) as a backdrop, it chronicles the efforts of a handicapped war veteran and his lover to flee their situation by using a flying machine powered by human will. Saramago alternates this allegorical fantasy with grimly realistic descriptions of the construction of the Mafra Convent by thousands of labourers pressed into service by King John V. Another ambitious novel, O ano da morte de Ricardo Reis (1984; The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis), juxtaposes the romantic involvements of its narrator, a poet-physician who returns to Portugal at the start of the Salazar dictatorship, with long dialogues that examine human nature as revealed in Portuguese history and culture. Saramago’s practice of setting whimsical parables against realistic historical backgrounds in order to comment ironically on human foibles is exemplified in two novels: A jangada de pedra (1986; The Stone Raft; film 2002), which explores the situation that ensues when the Iberian Peninsula breaks off from Europe and becomes an island, and O evangelho segundo Jesus Cristo (1991; The Gospel According to Jesus Christ), which posits Christ as an innocent caught in the machinations of God and Satan. The outspoken atheist’s ironic comments in The Gospel According to Jesus Christ were deemed too cutting by the Roman Catholic Church, which pressured the Portuguese government to block the book’s entry for a literary prize in 1992. As a result of what he considered censorship, Saramago went into self-imposed exile on the Canary Islands for the remainder of his life.
Among Saramago’s other novels are his first, Manual de pintura e caligrafia(1976; Manual of Painting and Calligraphy), and such subsequent works asHistoria do cerco de Lisboa (1989; The History of the Siege of Lisbon), Todos os nomes (1997; All the Names), O homem duplicado (2002; The Double), As intermitências da morte (2005; Death with Interruptions), and A viagem do elefante (2008; The Elephant’s Journey). Ensaio sobre a cegueira (1995; “Essay on Blindness”; Eng. trans. Blindness; film 2008) and Ensaio sobre a lucidez (2004; “Essay on Lucidity”; Eng. trans. Seeing) are companion novels. In 2012 his novel Claraboya (“Skylight”), which had been written in the 1950s but languished in a Portuguese publishing house for decades, was posthumously published.
Saramago also wrote poetry, plays, and several volumes of essays and short stories, as well as autobiographical works. His memoir As pequenas memórias (2006; Small Memories) focuses on his childhood. When he received the Nobel Prize in 1998, his novels were widely read in Europe but less well known in the United States; he subsequently gained popularity worldwide. He was the first Portuguese-language writer to win the Nobel Prize.


ABOUT THE NOVEL
This novel was originally published in Portuguese in 1984. It isn’t simply a book about a man’s final year of life; it is an artistic presentation of man’s relationship to the art, culture, and the circumstances of his times.
 This is the story about the final year of Ricardo Reis, who is the title character. Ricardo is a doctor who has been living in Brazil, but decides to return to Portugal upon hearing that the Portuguese writer Fernando Pessoa has died. He arrives on a steamship, and finds a hotel. He checks in, and for some reason, decides to just live there for 3 months. In the meantime, he develops an affair with a chambermaid, Lydia, and also develops a friendship with romantic overtones with Marcenda, a young girl who happens to live in Coimbra and is a frequent guest of the hotel, since she has been seeking treatment for her paralyzed arm. Three months pass, and he decides to move on, so he finds an apartment, and decides to continue his medical practice. His relationship with Lydia continues, albeit lukewarm. The novel ends with his death, after witnessing a small mutiny that happens involving three battleships. 

Characters

In the novel...
In reality...
Ricardo Reis
·        The main character of the novel.
·        A doctor who has emigrated to Brazil, returns to Lisbon at once when he receives news that Pessoa has died.

·      Ricardo Reis was one of three pseudonyms deployed by Portugal's most admired modernist poet, Fernando Pessoa.
·      Sums up his philosophy of life in his own words, admonishing: 'See life from a distance. Never question it. There's nothing it can tell you.'
Fernando Pesoa
·        A ghost of a Portuguese poet who is dear to Ricardo Reis. He visited Reis and they chat away about the ethics of romantic life and death, the nature of art, individual identity and all kinds of existential notions. 
·   A Portuguese poet, writer, philosopher, literary critic and translator, described as one of the most significant literary figures of the 20th century and one of the greatest poets in the Portuguese language.
·   Famous for his heteronyms, one of his 70 heteronyms is Ricardo Reis.
Lydia
·        A chambermaid of Hotel Braganca whom Reis developed an affair with.
·   The muse in one of Ricardo Reis’ odes.

·       Marcenda Sampaio— She is a young girl who is a frequent guest of the hotel, since she has been seeking treatment for her paralyzed arm. Ricardo Reis developed companionable love towards her.
·       Dr. Sampaio—He is an attorney and the father of Marcenda. He keeps on going to Lisbon from Coimbra for two reasons: for the regular treatment of Marcenda and for his mistress.
·       Salvador—He is the manager of the hotel Ricardo Reis stayed in for three months.

Distinctive Literary Style
The novel is written in Saramago's distinctive style, in which he uses no punctuation except commas and periods, denoting dialogue and changes of speaker using only capital letters. He uses long, flowing sentences and paragraphs often several pages in length. Saramago also digresses from the story frequently, occasionally even in the first person, remarking philosophically on the significance of images, objects or situations encountered in the story.



ANALYSIS

Ø  “The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis” is a surreal historical novel.
·       Ricardo Reis is a literary alter ego originally created by the great Portuguese modernist poet Fernando Pesoa. The very same Ricardo Reis is the protagonist of the novel. The story appeared surreal because it produced a fantastic imagery by means of unnatural juxtaposition. The combination of Ricardo Reis the alter ego and Ricardo Reis the main character presented an unexpected combination.
·       The novel is historical in the sense that it is set at the beginning of the Spanish revolution, and rise of dictators Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Salazar. It densely evoked historical context of encroaching fascism at Portugal and abroad.
·       Another thing that made the novel surreal is the juxtaposition of the fantastic and the reality. Reis was visited twelve times by the ghost of Pessoa and the two have lively discussions on many subjects, including art, life, politics, religion, and history. The bizarre occurrence happened with the juxtaposition of the fantastic and the reality. The novel is a combination of the potentially fantastic and the banal as well as the metaphoric and the everyday.
Ø  The novel presented Ricardo Reis’ alienation from the society.
·       Alienation is the state in which a person has completely forgotten his identity and becomes a new person, alien to his former self. Ricardo Reis in that case is partially alienated. With his society and even with himself. This was shown in the novel when he can’t tell who he really is. He also keeps distance between himself and the other characters. Reis is a wanderer who doesn’t seem content trying to describe his reasons for returning to Portugal, nor his relationships with two women, nearly his only contact with the outside world beyond his discussions with Pessoa. His greatest alienation happened when he loses a clear concept of the nature of life and death and the difference between the two.
Ø  The novel included the element of supernatural or magical realism.
·       These elements are inserted in the story as though they are fact with little attention drawn to the wonder of the occurrence.  In the novel, the fantastical element is observed in the visitation of Dr. Reis by his posthumous friend, Fernando Pessoa, the famed Portuguese poet who died in November 1935, just one month prior to the novel’s beginning.  Throughout the novel Fernando pops in to visit Ricardo, and unlike a ghost, Fernando has a physical form that is merely unique in that his form is visible only to those he chooses to view him.  Fernando’s appearances are like the appearance of any other character, he converses with Ricardo, discusses politics and Ricardo’s feminine exploits, and criticizes the poetic odes that Ricardo writes to occupy his time.

Ø  The novel is a rejection of the traditional narrative.
·       The novel is an exercise in meta-literature. Fernando Pessoa created the character of Ricardo Reis fifty years or more before this novel was written, giving him a biography and writing many poems in that name.  Saramago placed the two characters side by side. This suggests a deliberate blurring of the boundaries between fantasy and reality. The novel has a multitude of stories framing it, running alongside it or visible just beyond its borders. in the case of the novel, the fantastical retellings of official history was used. This is needed  to be included in the story he is telling us to let us imagine or  believe we imagine, that what is unfolding in the labyrinth of his text is one, unending metastory. In this novel, not only is a real-life character made dead, but a fake character was made alive and able to talk to a dead person.




Ø  Methapors
·       The town cemetery
-        When Reis pays a visit to the cemetery where Pessoa is buried, it appears to be a mirror image of the city itself, whose inhabitants have become deadened and passive.
·       Reis’ gradual loss of the concept of ‘living and death’
-        Ricardo Reis from the start of the novel is presented as a moribund character. This refers to his gradual detachment from the society.
·       The course of time before the death of Reis
-        The time signifies his gradual detachment to the world.
·       The death of Ricardo Reis
-        Reis "dies" by calmly putting on his jacket and following Pessoa to the graveyard. This shows his attempt to resist any sort of cultural contextualization and reject any place in society.
-        This suggests that Reis has taken his place among the living dead of fascist-ruled Lisbon, on the other hand he has secured a transcendent bond with Pessoa that is a counterpoint to the terrible times in which he was living. Reis was content to live a contemplative life in a crisis-torn Lisbon because fascism was simply not a part of his interior life. His inner exile into a poetic, literary, and philosophical world secures an identity untouched by the evils of the day.

PORTUGUESE LITERATURE
Portuguese literature is distinguished by a wealth of lyrical poetry, prose and verse. Literature has always been widely celebrated in Portugal and following the Roman occupation there was an abundance of historical writing that documented the country’s rulers, conquests and development.
·       cancioneiros ("song-books") evidence a school of love poetry that spread with the language to Spain at a time when Spanish literature was as yet undeveloped for lyrical purposes
·       romanceiro was influenced by Spanish literature, though not sharing the latter's predilection for the heroic.
·       Os Lusiadas by Luis Vas de Camoes is the most notable of all Portugues epic poem

Common themes in Portuguese Literary works:
·       Pastoral occurrences
·       National identity
·       Historical events
·        idealised and banal daily urban life

Notable Writers:
·       Luís de Camões (16C)
·       Fernando Pessoa (20C)
·       Eca de Queiroz
·       Alexandre O'Neill

WHAT MADE THE YEAR OF THE DEATH OF RICARDO REIS PORTUGUESE LITERATURE?
Ø  The novel embodied within it historical events, it showed the ordinary living of the urban people; it is heavy with the context of national identity.

.

 PERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN READING THE NOVEL
While reading the novel, I would often lose myself in the text, transported by the fluidity of Saramago’s narration that is light on the punctuation and can include paragraphs that go on for several pages.  At times the narrative voice would interject opinions smoothly into the description without failing to lose track of the forward movement of the descriptive process.  To provide an example of this narrative style, read the following passage that depicts a conversation between Ricardo Reis and his lover, Lydia:
“The people are like me a hotel chambermaid who has a revolutionary brother and sleeps with a doctor who is against revolutions.  Who taught you to say these things.  When I open my mouth the words are there, its just a matter of letting them  come out.  Generally, one thinks before he speaks. Well perhaps in my case it is like having a baby, which grows without our noticing it and is born when the time comes.  How have you been feeling lately. If it weren’t for missing my periods, I wouldn’t believe I was pregnant.  You are still determined, then to have the child, My baby boy, Your baby boy, Yes, and I am not likely to change my mind, Think about it carefully, But I don’t think.” (324)
The above passage not only ignores the expected apostrophes to separate dialogue, but towards the end the back and forth banter is only indicated by a comma followed by a capitalization of the other character’s first word of dialogue.  This style  caused confusion or frustration for me but then I think this is necessary towards placing the reader in the mind of Ricardo Reis.  For Ricardo Reis is a unique man who admires life but does not question it.  He is an observer who distastes both traditional and revolutionary thought.  He is man that pleasures in being without question.  Saramago uses the narrative style I’ve described above to paint a view of the world from Reis’s perspective, a perspective that is both detached and involved.
References:
Jose Saramago. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from http://www.britannica. com/EBchecked/ topic /523937/Jose-Saramago. September 21, 2012.

Hartnet, Kevin. Poetic Doubles: A Review of Jose Saramago’s The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis. Retrieved from http://www.themillions.com/2008/04/poetic-doubles-review-of-jose-saramago.html. September 29, 2012.


Migtang, Herbert. Books of the Times: Two Women, One Man, One Poet. Retrieved from http:// www.nytimes.com/books/98/10/04/specials/saramago-reis.html. September 29, 2012.

Doubts and Reservations on Rizal


Doubts and Reservations

Throughout the semester with the subject Ang Buhay at Mga Katha ni Rizal, I have learned so much more about the Philippine National hero, Jose Rizal. We have tackled many things about him—from his birth until his death. It was really like reading through his autobiography, although the lessons presented throughout the course also offered so many critics and comments about Rizal’s heroism. Anyway, I am glad that the lessons were not one-sided, what I mean is that in class, we looked at the different possible perspectives, there were no biases so to say. There were also lots of new things I’ve learned about him, things that I don’t know if it makes me like or dislike him. The subject is indeed one way of showing us what Rizal is really like, however we can never say that the lessons presented in class were enough for us to say that we really know Rizal. We can never say that. How did I say so? First is because Rizal was born in the earlier times—he is history. What we know about him now is his history, Rizal will never be here to tell us what he really was like, what was in his mind in those time and what really did he want to achieve in his writings. We can never say, as they say, the historians made it for us. But so as I believe, history is a story, it is consists of facts but it also have opinions embodied in it depending on who the historian is.

With that I can say that Rizal’s history presented to us in class made me feel that I should not totally like him, I should not totally dislike him either, rather it made me respect the concept that he is the national hero but I will never go as far as worshipping him as if he is a god because he was not, his death doesn’t make him a god either. He was just an ordinary person like us, his difference to the ordinary people were of course his intelligence, education, his writings, and his death, and his plight against the colonizers, other than that there was none, his human too, he feels, acts and reacts like common people do.

The course was intended to make us think and know more about Rizal, it gave us a challenge, in fact it made us really question Rizal’s heroism and some of us even question his personality. But isn’t it a bit unfair for him that we get to say what we would want to but he in fact will never be there to defend himself? That is the reason why I said earlier that the better thing to feel about Rizal is to just respect the fact that he is the hero, yes we have our own inquisitions within us but how can we ever answer it? Who will be there to prove something to us? Sometimes I really wish time machines were real sow can see the truth and mysteries of the past with our own eyes and so we can freely give judgment to what has happened then.

Just the same, we can never and we don’t have the right to question how Rizal acted then. He is also human, he had his own rights, he had his own choices, he can do whatever he wanted. I’m sure that if other Filipinos were in the same shoes as Rizal was then, there will always be someone who did exactly like what Rizal have done. He was also human, he is not perfect like us and besides, he was not the one who hailed himself as the national hero, a group of people hailed him as one. We can never blame him or even be very grateful for what he had done in the past because we also have our own doubts and reservations towards him. What we can only do is to respect him just the way we wanted to be respected if ever we were hailed to be in his place. 

On Philippine History: The Philippine Revolution



The Philippine Revolution

Overview of the Report
          This report tackles the first Philippine Revolution, the first revolution against western colonial rule in Asia. In here, we are going to look at the history and origin of the revolution, people and heroes who lead the revolution as well as the end of revolution and some historical facts which will help us point to many important issues which arise during the revolution.

The Philippine Revolution
          The Philippine Revolution, the first against western colonial rule in Asia, was directed against Spain which had colonized the Philippines since 1565.  The Revolution against Spain had two phases: the first from the declaration of defiance against Spanish rule on August 23, 1896 till the conclusion of a truce in December 1897; the second from the return till the outbreak of the Filipino-American War in February 1899. It was an accumulation of numbers of ideas and exposition to international community that led to the opening of nationalistic endeavors. With that, it is evident that the rise of Filipino nationalism was slow but inevitable. Abuses by the Spanish government, military and the clergy prevalent during its three centuries of occupation, and the exposition of these excesses by the Illustrados in the late 19th century paved the way for a united Filipino people. Unfortunately, the growth of nationalism was slow because of the difficulty in social and economic association among the Filipinos. 


 ORIGINS/HISTORY
*     Manila and World Trade
·        The Spanish authorities discouraged foreign merchants from residing in the colony and engaging in business before the opening of Manila for trade.
·        It is the royal decree of February 2, 1800 as well as the royal decrees of 1807 and 1816, which prohibited foreigners from living in the Philippines.
·         Governor-General Mariano Ricafort promulgated a decree prohibiting foreign merchants from engaging in retail trade and visiting the provinces for purposes of trade in 1823.
·         A royal decree in 1844 prohibited foreigners from travelling to the provinces under any excuse.
·        The British occupation of Manila made Spain realize the impossibility of isolating the colony from world association and commerce.
·        In 1789, foreign vessels were given permission to transport Asian goods to the ports of Manila.
·        Governor-General Feliz Berenquer de Marquinare recommended to the King of Spain the opening of Manila to world trade. The bankruptcy of the Real Compana de Filipinas (Royal Company of the Philippines) propelled the Spanish king to open Manila in world trade in 1790.
·        The royal decree of September 6, 1834 abolished the privileges of the Royal Company of the Philippines and opened the port of Manila to trade.

*     Economic surveys, port openings and admission of foreign firms

·        The opening of Manila to world trade caused the loss of the commercial supremacy of Spanish merchants in the Philippines
·        American merchants settled in Manila and built business.
·        The supremacy of American trade did not last long because of heavy competition against the Bristish. Their decline was said to be because of the lack of support from the home government as well as a lack of US trade bases.
·        Sinibaldo de Mas was sent by the Spanish government to the Philippines to conduct an economic survey of the Philippines. Sinibaldo declared in his survey that the more ports are needed to be opened for foreign trade, encourage immigration of Chinese to encourage agricultural development, and the abolition of the tobacco monopoly.

*     Enlightenment
·        The Filipino society before the Philippine Revolution was subdivided into social classifications based on the economic status of the people involved:


The Philippine Society
Masses/Indios
Peninsulares
Creoles
Poor commoners, labourers, peasants
Principalia
Middle Class/ Illustrados
Well-to-do farmers, teachers, attorneys, doctors
 









§ Principalia
-        The highest social classification in the society.
-        Includes landlords, teachers, local officials and ex-officials.
-        The members of this class constituted the social aristocracy of a town.
-        Peninsulares
- Spanish-born Spaniards living in the Philippines
                                 -      Creoles
                                        - Spaniards born in colonies
§  Masses/Indio
-        The lower class; only enjoyed few civil rights and priveleges.
-        The highest possible office they can hold is goberndorcillo.
-        Most members of the Katipunan came from this class.
§  The Middle Class
-        They are consists of the well-to-do farmers, teachers, lawyers, physicians, writers and government employees.
-        Many of them were able to buy and read books which were forfeited for lowly Filipinos.
-        They discussed political problems and sought reforms.
-        They were able to send their children/study in universities in Manila and abroad.
-        Their progress was largely due to the opening of trades in Manila.
-        From this class came the leading intellectuals of the country; they were called Illustrados, meaning “knowledgeable ones” as well as the “intelligentsia” or the intelligent ones.
-        The prominent members of the Propaganda Movement came from this class. They stirred the very first flames of the revolution.
*     Rise of the Filipino Nationalism
·        Secularization
§  The middle class demanded that the churches in the Philippines be nationalized.
§  With this, the control of Philippine parishes was to be passed from the religious orders to the secular priests, particularly Filipino priests.

*     Criollo Rebellion
·        The Criollo, through their writings began spreading the ideals of French revolution in the Philippines.
·        A royal decree ordered the secularization of Philippine churches and many parishes were turned over to Philippine-born priests.


ORGANIZATIONS
*     La Solidaridad, La Liga Filipina and the Propaganda Movement
·       La Solidaridad
§  Founded by Filipinos in Europe.
§  A newspaper that pressed fro reforms in the Philippines through Propaganda, hence it is also known as the Propaganda movement.
§  Included the membership of leading Spanish liberals such as Morayta.
§  The pioneer editors were Graciano Lopez Jaena, Marcelo H. Del Pilar and Jose Rizal.
§  Run out of funds without accomplishing concrete changes in the Philippines.
·       La Liga Filipina
§  Founded by Jose Rizal when he returned to the Philippines.
§  The Manila chapter of the Propaganda movement.
§  Arrest of Jose Rizal caused the Liga to be discontinued.
·       Aims of the Propaganda Movement are:
§  To promote inequality of Filipino and Spaniards before the law;
§  Assimilation of the Philippines as a regular province of Spain;
§  Restoration of Philippine representation in the Spanish Cortes;
§  “Filipinization” of the Catholic parishes and
§  Granting of individual liberties to Filipino such as freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and freedom to petition for grievances.
*     Katipunan(KKK)
·       Founded by Andres Bonifacio, Deodato Arellano, Ladislao Diwa, Teodoro Plata as “Kataas-taasang, Kagalang-galangang Katipunan ng mga Anak ng Bayan” in Manila on July 7, 1892.
·       Advocates independence through armed revolt against Spain.
·       From Manila, it expanded into several provinces: Batangas, Laguna, Cavite, Bulacan, Pampanga, Tarlac, Nueva Ecija, Ilocos Sur, Ilacas Norte, Pangasinan, Bicol and Mindanao.
·       The members called “Katipuneros” came from the lower and middle classes.
·       It had its own laws, bureaucratic structure and effective leadership.
·       Andres Bonifacio was the supreme leader (Supremo) of the Katipunan.
·       The estimated number of members was estimated to 30, 000 to 40, 000.

START OF THE REVOLUTION
·       Teodoro Patino revealed the existence of the Katipunan to a Spanish priest named Mariano Gil. Patino was enraged with a fellow Katipunero named Mariano Gil and so he exposed the Katipunan in revenge.
·       Authorities ensued several arrests in 1872. Most of them were the wealthiest Illustrados whose signatures were forged by Bonifacio hoping that they would be forced to support the Katipunan.
·       Katipunan members were gathered by Bonifacio to a mass gathering in Caloocan. The event was marked by a mass tearing of cedulas accompanied by patriotic cries.
·       The rebels attack in Manila started on August 25 to the evening of August 29, 2872.
·       The revolt had spread to eight provinces involved in the Katipunan on August 30: Manila, Bulacan, Cavite, Pampanga, Tarlac, Laguna, Batangas, and Nueva ecija. Governor-General Blanco declared a “state of war” in these provinces and placed trhem under martial law.
·       The rebels were mostly armed with bolo knives and bamboo spears; they lack firearms.
*     Execution of Jose Rizal
·       Rizal was sent to Spain to help in the medical service in the Cuban War of Independence.
·       He was sent back to the Philippines and was imprisoned in Fort Santiago.
*     Revolution in Cavite
·       The Cavite revolutionaries won prestige in defeating Spanish troops.
·       The revolution in Cavite was led by Emilio Aguinaldo who also founded the Magdalo troop.
Katipunan in Cavite
Magdalo
Magdiwang
 







·       The Katipunan in Cavite was divided into two councils:
§   Magdiwang 
-        Led by Alvarez
-        Recognized Bonifacio as the Supreme Leader
§  Magdalo
-        Led by Baldomero Aguinaldo
-        Recognized Aguinaldo as the supreme leader becaus of his successes in the battlefield compared to Bonifacio’s record of defeats.
*     Tejeros Convention
·       The meeting in Tejeros accounts for the election of officers for the revolutionary government.
·       The meeting was chaired by Bonifacio who said that the results of the elections shall be respected.
·       When the election was finished, Aguinaldo was proclaimed as the winner.
*     Bonifacio’s Execution
·       The War Council sentenced Andres and his brother Procopio to death on May 10, 2897 for committing sedition and treason.
·       Major Lazaro Makapagal, upon orders from General Mariano Noriel, executed the brothers at Mount Buntis, Maragondon, Cavite on May 10.
*     Biak-na-Bato
·       The Pact of Biak-na-Bato was signed. It was made up of three documents focusing for the following agenda:
§  The surrender of Aguinaldo and the rest of the revolutionary corps
§  Amnesty for those who participated in the revolution
§  Exile to Hong Kong for revolutionary leadership.
§  Payment by the Spanish government
*     The Revolution Continues
·       The Pact of Biak-na-Bato did not signal an end to the revolution.
·       The Filipino patriots renewed their commitment for complete independence. They purchased more arms and ammunition to ready themselves for another siege.

*     Aguinaldo Returns to the Philippines
·       Aguinaldo departed Hong Kong aboard McCulloch on May 17 and arrived in Cavite on May 19.

*     Declaration of Independence
·       It was under this dictatorship that independence was finally proclaimed on June 12, 1898 in Aguinaldo's house in Kawit, Cavite.
·       The first Filipino flag was unfurled and the national anthem was played for the first time.